Dry Floodproofing
Dry floodproofing is a practice of utilizing waterproof membranes and other types of sealants to prevent floodwater from entering a building.[^1] It may also include the installation of watertight seals over windows and doors, diversion of water using berms and mounds, or the establishment of minimum setback regulations for building construction. [^3] [^5] [^6] [^7] [^11] The work required to dry flood-proof a structure could be determined through a risk assessment following local government requirements, guidelines, or policies.[^2] [^3] Depending on the complexity of the requirements, dry floodproofing is usually a cost-effective retrofit. Dry floodproofing contributes to a reduction in potential flood damage by decreasing the probability of inundation to the interior of a building. Dry floodproofing is a useful alternative as a flood mitigation measure where the relocation or elevation of a building is not a plausible cost-effective or technically feasible alternative. [^12]
Types of dry floodprofing
- Continuous impermeable walls include sealing the exterior walls of a building, utilizing waterproof membranes that are impermeable and that have the potential to strengthen the walls.
- Flood resistant interior core areas include important components and areas of a building that are made flood-resistant instead of dry proofing the entire footprint of the building.
- Flood shields are watertight structures that close any opening in a building’s exterior walls to prevent the entry of floodwater. [^12]
- Internal drainage systems are used to remove water that might seep into a building through fissures or other openings that comprise a flood protection system.
✓ Benefits
- Builds resilience by providing a secondary means of protection to dikes
- Improves flood protection when other measures are difficult to implement due to space constraints
- Less costly when compared to other methods of flood retrofitting
- The implementation does not require additional land space [^11]
- Can be used to bring non-residential structures into compliance with floodplain management regulations and codes [^12]
✗ Challenges
- Will not minimize the impacts of high-velocity water flow and wave action on a building or structure [^11]
- May be difficult to apply to existing buildings and infrastructure
- May not always lead to an improvement in flood mitigation that aligns with existing floodplain management bylaws [^11]
- May fail, if flooding exceeds the level of flood protection intervention
Example projects
Citations
<! data-preserve-html-node="true"-- Regular citations -->
[^1]:
The Arlington Group Planning Architecture Inc., et al. Sea Level Rise Adaptation Primer. pp. 62. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/environment/climate-change/adaptation/resources/slr-primer.pdf
[^2]:
Ibid, 62.
[^3]:
FEMA. Selecting Appropriate Mitigation Measures for Floodprone Structures. 1 Mar. 2007, pp. 1. https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1608-20490-9182/fema_551_ch_07.pdf
[^4]:
HafenCity Hamburg GmbH. “Flood-Secure Bases Instead of Dikes: Safe from High Water in HafenCity.” HafenCity, https://www.hafencity.com/en/concepts/flood-secure-bases-instead-of-dikes-safe-from-high-water-in-hafencity.html.
[^5]:
Ibid.
[^6]:
Ibid.
[^7]:
Flood Construction Levels and Setbacks for Farm Building Situations. British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture, July 2008, pp. 2. https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/farming-natural-resources-and-industry/agriculture-and-seafood/farm-management/structures-and-mechanization/823400-2_flood_const_levels_and_setbacks.pdf.
[^8]:
Ibid, 2.
[^9]:
Ibid, 3-4.
[^10]:
Ibid, 5.
[^11]:
FEMA (n.d) Chapter 7 dry floodproofing. Retrieve from https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1608-20490-9182/fema_551_ch_07.pdf
[^12]:
FEMA (n.d). Dry Floodproofing Measures. https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/06dabddadc3887f91906172d863749ab/P-936_sec3_508.pdf
<! data-preserve-html-node="true"-- Images --> [^i1]: Figure 1. FEMA (n.d) Chapter 7 dry floodproofing. Retrieve from https://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1608-20490-9182/fema_551_ch_07.pdf [^i2]: Figure 2. Wikimedian Commonsé (2020). File:Hamburg, HafenCity, Bebauung am Sandtorkai -- 2016 -- 3036.jpg